Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland Gets Terrible News With New Revelations Showing Potential Felony

According to an article in The Washington Times, evidence has emerged that the manuals given to deputy U.S. marshals discouraged them from making arrests of picketers in relation to the fallout from the leaking of the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood by pro-abortion activists who illegally picketed before Supreme Court conservative justices houses. This revelation stands in contrast to Mr. Garland’s previous testimony before Congress where he insisted that he left the decision to arrest to other authorities.

Indeed, that testimony was noted in a previous article in the DC Enquirer where when Mr. Garland was pressed on why there were no arrests or prosecutions of the picketers, he “deflected by saying that it was up to the US Marshals, as well as state and local authorities on whether to arrest someone.” Yet, Senator Katie Britt (R-AL) confronted the Attorney General of the United States with the training packages used by the marshals protecting the justices. It stated that arrests were not to be a priority. This led her to remark that “They [the marshals] were actively discouraged [by the guidance manual] from doing so [making arrests].”

Slide 2 of the training package to the marshal explicitly stated “making arrests and initiating prosecutions is not the goal of the USMS presence at SCOTUS residence.” She also noted in her comments on the slides that there was an instruction that discouraged “the Marshals from making arrests under 18 U.S.C. §1507 [the anti-picketing law] by asserting that there may be a First Amendment right to harass the Justices and their families.” Most damning for Mr. Garland, however, is that said training material in the words of Britt’s comments “states that it would be ‘counter-productive’ for the Marshals to make arrests on cases that DOJ ‘will not charge and prosecute’.”

WATCH: Secretary Mayorkas Humiliated by Senate Republicans, Can’t Answer Basic Questions

All of this stands in contrast to Garland’s prior sworn stance that the marshals on the scene had full authority to make arrests yet one slide “directed the Marshals to coordinate any enforcement action in advance with the relevant DOJ U.S. Attorney’s Office.” Mr. Garland is the head of the same Department of Justice.

As noted by conservative political commentator Amuse, “According to DOJ documents AG Garland lied to congress. US Marshals were ordered not to arrest pro-abortion protesters who were illegally stalking Supreme Court Justices despite Garland’s testimony.”

PERJURY: According to DOJ documents AG Garland lied to congress. US Marshals were ordered not to arrest pro-abortion protesters who were illegally stalking Supreme Court Justices despite Garland’s testimony.https://t.co/bDueYBlF6W

— @amuse (@amuse) March 29, 2023

Merrick Garland defended himself by saying he did not know about those guidance directives and still maintained that authorities on the ground were left to make their own decisions freely. He further mused that he took the unprecedented act of sending marshals to protect the judges and that the marshal’s first priority was the protection of justices’ lives and property while not being “precluded from making other kinds of arrests”. Senator Britt shot back that “[i]t’s clear the marshals were given a different directive. I’d ask you to look into that.”