Former Capitol Police Chief: Jan. 6th 'Appears To Be A Cover-Up' - Vindicating Trump, Says He Was 'Denied Any Support From National Guard'

The former Chief of the US Capitol Police, who commanded the department during the January 6th Capitol Riot, was subsequently drummed out by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and publicly blamed for the incident, spoke to Tucker Carlson in an interview that Fox News refused to air. He described what appears to have been a "cover-up" of the events that day in the interview that was partially leaked by Raheem Kassam at The National Pulse.  

In a startling moment, Sund raised the question that someone in the government possibly "wanted something to happen."

According to The National Pulse, the interview, which lasted about an hour, featured Sund recounting angrily that he was denied National Guard support and was not provided with the intelligence needed for his officers to do their job. "I'm a little pissed off," he said.

He is seen telling Carlson, 
 

“If people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I've got significant experience, we wouldn’t be here, this didn’t have to happen. Then seeing how you're out there, you're lambasted in public and it's all, you know, everything appears to be a coverup.”

He added, "Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…"

"You're in a fight for a couple of minutes it wears you out, one minute, I was gonna say sixty seconds, three minutes," he said. "Let me tell you it wears you out. My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before (garbled) [the protesters entered the capitol?]"

When Carlson presented the possibility that intelligence was withheld from Sund, the former Chief asked, 

“Could there possibly be actually… they kind of wanted something to happen? It’s not a far stretch to begin to think that. It’s sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out… what was their end goal?”

In a second segment of the interview released by The National Pulse in a subsequent story, Carlson continued by asking about the intel lapse. He said, "So let’s go back to the role of, you said nine out of the 18 agencies in the so-called intelligence community are military, Pentagon supervised… military intel. Would they have been gathering, it sounds like they were gathering information about January 6th before it happened?"

Sund was direct: "Well, again, for Milley and Miller, to be that concerned about, uh, about January 6th in advance, they had to be getting the intelligence from somewhere. I mean, talk about locking down Washington, D.C.? That’s a huge undertaking. Um, and again, to never, never notify me."

WATCH:
 

Throughout the interview, Sund is consistent that he was 1.) Never provided mission-critical intelligence necessary to protect the Capitol and 2.) Was denied reinforcement by the DC National Guard both prior to and during the breach of the Capitol building.

The interview does raise a terrifying unanswered question: Who, if anyone, WANTED the January 6th Capitol Riot to happen? And it isn't difficult to assess for the well-informed with a knowledge of history.

In our history, we can point to several instances where a seat of power was attacked like the charge of the Bastille in revolutionary France for instance. But far more analogous to Jan. 6th was the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933, in Berlin.

At the risk of a Godwin's law violation, four weeks after the German parliament burned to the ground a new government was swept into power on the wings of public outrage and fear that led the nation down a horrific path.

Likewise, two weeks after the Jan. 6th Capitol riot, the Biden administration was sworn into office, with a majority in both houses of Congress, and has since, over the past 2+ years, used every method available to it to politically and legally persecute everyone who was even tangentially connected to the 45th President Donald Trump, the 2020 election controversy, and the events of Jan. 6th.

So, just as it was with the Reichstag fire, we really need to simply ask from a historical standpoint: Who benefitted the most from that day? That's where you'll find the answer to Sund's question.

You can follow Matt Holloway on Facebook, Twitter, TruthSocial, Gettr, Gab & Parler.