The New York Times Turns On Biden, BLASTS The President For Not Accepting Hunter’s Love Child

Even The New York Times is fed up with Joe Biden and his slimy family, with the typically hyper-liberal news publication releasing an article tearing the president apart for his disgusting act of denying his seventh grandchild that was born from an affair that Hunter Biden had. 

The mentally deficient president got in hot water recently after both he and First Lady Jill Biden stated they only had six grandchildren, publicly ostracizing the four-year-old granddaughter that was conceived with Lunden Alexis Roberts, per Fox News. The Biden family has been in court battles with the former adult entertainer over child support payments as well as revoking the child's right to use the Biden name despite DNA testing proving that she is Hunter's daughter. 

The White House even went as far as telling all the aides that Joe only has six grandchildren, not the actual number of seven, in strategy meetings. This isn’t the first time that Biden has doubled down on this lie. He previously stated at the White House ‘take your child to work day’ that he has “six grandchildren, and [he’s] crazy about them. And [he speaks] to them every single day. Not a joke.”

Even the left can see through the immoral smoke and mirrors. New York Times opinion columnist Maureen Dowd, someone whose history of articles like “Nancy Pelosi, Liberated and Loving It,” would seem to be more left-leaning, released the article “It’s Seven Grandkids, Mr. President.” The article rips into Joe Biden for not accepting his granddaughter, comparing him to other notable figures that have been in similar situations.

A fair bit of the opinion piece sees Dowd discussing how her sister, someone who she states is a Republican, is writing to Joe Biden in hopes of convincing the president to accept his son’s love child. Dowd notes how she and her sister have disagreed on many political topics, but they were both able to agree that what President Biden is doing right now is highly immoral.

The New York Times writer also notes how his actions go against his mantra of “the absolute most important thing is your family.” Dowd does award Hunter far more sympathy than most on the right do, saying that she has “sympathy for Hunter going into a ‘dark, bleak hole,’ as he called it. I have sympathy for a father coping with a son who was out of control and who may still be fragile.”

Even through this sympathy, Dowd still believes that denying the existence of the seventh grandkids is wrong. “But the president can’t defend Hunter and all his other messes and draw the line at accepting one little girl.”

The situation is one that seems to draw unanimous disgust from both sides of the political aisle. When everyone can look at a situation and all agree that the decision made is immoral and wrong, it’s pretty obvious that what the president is doing is something that shouldn’t be done by the Commander-In-Chief of the United States of America.