WATCH: Jack Smith Holds Press Conference Announcing Indictment Of Donald Trump For Alleged Fraud, Conspiracy To Obstruct 2020 Election

Shortly before 6 p.m. EST, DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in November of 2022 did what he was hired specifically to do: indict 45th President and GOP Presidential frontrunner Donald J. Trump criminally for his handling of the 2022 election controversy.

In a press conference clocking in at just under four minutes, Smith laid out the predetermined case against Trump just days after utterly damning Congressional testimony implicated Biden and his son Hunter in one of the most astonishing and blatant allegations of bribery and corruption in U.S. history as previously reported by DC Enquirer.

In full context, Smith told the press, 

"Today, an indictment was unsealed charging Donald J. Trump with felony violations of our national security laws, as well as participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. This indictment was voted by a grand jury of citizens in the Southern District of Florida, and I invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged.

The men and women of the United States intelligence community and our armed forces dedicate their lives to protecting our nation and its people. Our laws that protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the United States, and they must be enforced Violations of those laws put our country at risk.

Adherence to the rule of law is a bedrock principle of the Department of Justice and our nation's commitment to the rule of law sets an example for the world. We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone applying those laws, collecting facts. That's what determines the outcome of an investigation. Nothing more and nothing less.

The prosecutors in my office are among the most talented and experienced in the Department of Justice. They have investigated this case adhering to the highest ethical standards, and they will continue to do so as this case proceeds.

It's very important for me to note that the defendants, in this case, must be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

To that end, my office will seek a speedy trial in this matter, consistent with the public interest and the rights of the accused. We very much look forward to presenting our case to a jury of citizens in the Southern District of Florida.

In conclusion, I would like to thank the dedicated public servants of the Federal Bureau of Investigation with whom my office is conducting this investigation and who worked tirelessly every day upholding the rule of law in our country. I'm deeply proud to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with them. Thank you very much."

After finishing his remarks, Smith refused to take questions from the press.

WATCH:

In the 45-page indictment, Smith and his team refer repeatedly to so-called "false claims." However, the majority of these assertions were never adjudicated in court and were largely dismissed on dubious, contradictory, and obscure procedural grounds, or as in the case of the historic Texas v. Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, & Pennsylvania brought before the Supreme Court, a blatantly counterfactual reasoning ("Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” despite the lawful conduct of elections self-evidently being in the interest of EVERY state.)

The core issues at play in the 2020 election: the security of electronic voting systems and mail-in ballots, the constitutional authority of the Vice-President during electoral college tallying, and most of all the constitutionality of changes to the electoral process made without legislative approval by the States were in fact, never fully adjudicated by the Supreme Court and remain unanswered legal questions to this day.

Phrases like "laches," "lacked standing," "lacked jurisdiction," "moot," and "denied without issuing an opinion" predominate the cases heard about the election. It was the judicial equivalent of sticking one's fingers in one's ears while loudly singing 'la,la,la,la,la.' It is based upon this flimsy foundation that Smith and his team assert Trump "repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud."

As Rogan O'Handley aka DC Draino noted on X App, "It is *very* important to note he was not charged with Seditious Conspiracy or Insurrection Those 2 charges, if convicted by a Leftist DC jury, would prohibit him from running in 2024 These charges are desperate acts from a desperate regime trying to do everything they can to stop the man that will hold them accountable in 2025"

Notably, the case is to be tried in the Southern Florida Federal District Court and NOT as O'Handley pointed out in Washington, D.C.

You can follow Matt Holloway on Facebook, Twitter, TruthSocial, Gettr, Gab & Parler.