Trump Exoneration Incoming: DOJ Misconduct Likely To Result In Dismissal Of Documents Case

Leading 2024 presidential candidate and 45th President Donald Trump is set to be proven right once again as far-left Special Counsel Jack Smith’s frivolous indictment of him will likely be dismissed due to misconduct by the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The misconduct by President Joe Biden’s DOJ is vast, hard to miss, and grows by the day.

The lawyer for Trump co-defendant Waltine “Walt” Nauta's, a Navy valet who worked for the Trump White House and is now a personal aide of Trump, Washington attorney Stanley Woodward, claimed that Jack Smith’s team has threatened to prevent him from becoming a D.C. Superior Court judge if Nauta refuses to testify against Trump.

Nauta's lawyer says that former DOJ Counterintelligence Chief and member of Jack Smith’s team, Jay Bratt, made the threat during a meeting.

If proven true, Bratt’s actions could constitute attempted witness tampering, attempted federal bribery, attempted extortion by a federal official, and attempted subornation of perjury.

'If Woodward’s claims are proven, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon would be well within her rights to consider a dismissal here," former federal prosecutor Will Scharf wrote in an article for The Federalist.

But that’s not all. Former Trump attorney Tim Parlotore revealed last month that he has witnessed 45 instances of DOJ misconduct.

During an MSNBC appearance in June, Parlotre said, “The biggest issue, of course, Andy, is prosecutorial misconduct. This is a case where you have prosecutors who have consistently demonstrated lack of ethics and willingness to lie to federal judges in sealed proceedings.”

“Forty-five separate times — I know sounds like I made that number up — but 45 separate times they tried to to get into attorney-client privileged information and frequently when the question was asked about conversations between attorney and client, they would turn to the grand jury and say, ‘so you’re refusing to provide that information to the grand jury?’ At a certain point, further exchange ensued where the prosecutor says, ‘Well isn’t it possible to waive the privilege? And if President Trump is being so cooperative, why won’t he waive the privilege and allow you to tell the jury about his conversations with you?’ That’s totally improper. And I know, Andy, that you know, had it happened during a jury trial, it would be a mistrial, right there.”

Trump, who was also frivolously indicted by far-left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in March, was federally indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith last month.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all 37 fraudulent counts brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith relating to him supposedly “mishandling” classified documents.

Luckily for Trump, he has the ultimate defense. Trump turned Jack Smith’s frivolous federal indictment of him on its head when he cited the Presidential Records Act as a defense.

The Presidential Records Act is a 1978 law that allows presidents to decide what records to keep and take, regardless of what the National Archives and Records Administration thinks.

On Wednesday morning, Trump took to his top-rated social media platform, Truth Social, writing, "Please remember that the only reason I was indicted (ELECTION INTERFERENCE) is because the Democrats don’t want to run against me."

You can follow Reed Cooper on Instagram here, Truth Social here, and Twitter here.